| Pages: [1] |
1. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: But you've got another thing coming if you think this will stop all boxing. I don't think it and I wont stop boxing. Cheers Nico
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 19:38:46
|
2. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Quote: Fair EVE Pick one, and only one. A well established trader with hundreds of billions of ISK can run rings around the smaller traders trying to get into a certain market simply because he has more funds and can sha...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 18:56:09
|
3. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: You clearly didn't read what he posted or else you would have realized that he didn't use ISBoxer before, but will now. He's not worried about the current broadcast ban thanks to Round Robin and VideoFX. He explained very rat...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 18:06:37
|
4. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Nico Fruehinsfeld wrote: Oh, no worries. Guy's like you can't make me unhappy. I'm a really happy person. Also the stuff you are writing is very funny but feel free to stop it if you feel tired of it. It sounds like an atte...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 17:33:22
|
5. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Edit: Honestly, I get tired of arguing with players like you. The way you see it, you don't play that way, so nobody should be allowed to. You scream and cry and whine when you feel someone else's playstyle unfair and all bec...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 16:31:26
|
6. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: * Setup phase - Log in all accounts (broadcast, still allowed) - Fleet invite all accounts (single client) - Accept fleet invite (broadcast, now banned, can use Round robin instead) - Undock (broadcast, now banned, can use Ro...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 11:38:09
|
7. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: At the end of the day what it boils down to is traders you don;t see, so you don't care. Multiboxers you do see, and it makes you envious so you cry endlessly about how unfair it is. I can't wait for you too see how little th...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 10:19:50
|
8. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nolak Ataru wrote: Nico Fruehinsfeld wrote: Oh come on, no one cares if you log in all your toons together or not. Use what you want for that. The most important part is that you wont be allowed to interact broadcasted with several toons in ...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 09:08:03
|
9. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Drago Shouna wrote: Rubbish... The only reason these stupid sized fleets exist is because of outside programmes in the first place. Take those programmes away and I honestly can't see anyone in their right mind spending h...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.24 00:04:08
|
10. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Nico Fruehinsfeld wrote: Many of them have similar character names. Anyways, I dont know much about the technical possibilities, but broadcasting multiplexers should have the same IP address? Maybe there is also an individu...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 16:18:34
|
11. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Nico Fruehinsfeld wrote: You can say what you want. The arms race has to be stopped and im glad that CCP has the same opinion. It's good for your and my health and for all other players, especially new ones. As soon as I no...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 16:16:17
|
12. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Delt0r Garsk wrote: You know the server ticks are 1 second right. There is literally no difference in a game play mechanic perspective between perfect synchronization and and all hitting f1 in about 1/2 a second. (1/2 a second is a long time. )...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 15:47:18
|
13. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Delt0r Garsk wrote: If you think there was an arms race to have the most accounts, you are wrong. Really put up or shut up. Show us these fleets of 50+ ships roaming around winning eve? Hell even 20+. I see the odd 3-5 ships (including scout+li...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 15:28:21
|
14. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Nico Fruehinsfeld wrote: A bad broadcaster has a chance of 50% to press the right buttons in the right order. There is no void to fill, no group dynamic. It's like playing EVE as a single player game, what sounds ok, but it...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 15:10:01
|
15. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: The spirit of EVE is multiboxing. It's pretty much a game design goal. And it really makes no difference to most rational people how many actual players there are behind accounts. And sure, a person can make a mistake, but qui...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 13:59:58
|
16. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lucas Kell wrote: Nico Fruehinsfeld wrote: I got ganked from CODE and some Goons while i was in an Obelisk. They did a really good job. It was made brilliant and from a huge count of players. I would get really pissed off if I would get gank...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 13:08:37
|
17. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: There are many people in this thread that think your cheating. Of course that is mostly cus they are jealous. I agree. Quote: I have 3 monitors at home and 6 at work :D. I can set linux up to allow me to play many clients pretty ...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 12:42:52
|
18. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: ISBoxer is not automation. Fact. Maybe chaeting is the right expression. Quote: It's not about need, it's about want. I don't need to drive to work, It's a mission but I could walk, but I prefer driving there. Using a tool to augm...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 11:33:57
|
19. Announcement:Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thank you CCP, I'm glad to read that! I'm using a few client simultaneously and i never used extra software tools to manage them. Not alone because it's unfair against all other players. I did not use such tools like ISBoxer because I like to "pl...
- by Nico Fruehinsfeld - at 2014.12.14 10:19:15
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |